AI Enablement + Workflow Implementation

AI that works inside your actual workflow, not on top of it

Your team is already using AI. The question is whether it's working for you, or whether your CD is rewriting 80% of every draft to make it sound like your brand again.

I spent a year building the AI infrastructure I kept wishing existed at every job I've ever had. Now I build it for creative teams: inside your Slack, your Asana, your Notion, your Google Drive. I watch how your people work day to day, then wire AI into the grooves of what's already happening. Not everything gets undone and rebuilt. Most of it gets optimized, connected, and amplified.

And when the engagement ends, your team owns and runs everything we built. That part is structural, not a nice-to-have.

Skip to the offers

Where teams usually are when they call me

The AI drafts don't sound like you

Captions, briefs, decks, product copy, all of it coming out sounding like every other brand on the internet. The time savings are imaginary when a senior creative rewrites most of every draft. And each AI-touched draft quietly becomes the new baseline for your voice.

Two people use AI, ten don't

A couple of early adopters use it for everything. A few dabble. The rest don't touch it. No shared playbook, no shared prompts, no shared brand context, and output quality that depends on who picked up the work that day.

Pressure with no playbook

The CEO or the client wants AI on the invoice. A board meeting produced a mandate and zero headcount. You've subscribed to four tools, use one inconsistently, and every Wednesday somebody swears a new one is the answer.

How to work together

Four ways in

The two places to start have a number attached. Ongoing work gets scoped with you, because what fits a 12-person studio doesn't fit a 60-person brand working under a board mandate.

Entry point

Operating Audit

Starting at $2,500

Paid on signing · 2 weeks

A two-week paid diagnostic that shows exactly where your team's time is going, what's safe to automate, what should be offloaded, and what to watch on the AI horizon. A diagnostic, not an implementation, and I'll say that plainly up front.

  • Three stakeholder interviews
  • Workflow observation across your existing stack
  • 6-page scorecard: time sinks, automation candidates, delegation opportunities, horizon shifts
  • 90-day roadmap with prioritized actions
  • Findings walkthrough, plus a follow-up call within 30 days
Add-on or standalone

Voice Kit

Starting at $4,500

One-time, paid on signing

Brand voice extraction as a named, scoped deliverable. I interview your voice owners, audit your real collateral, distill how you sound into a working document, and build it directly into Claude so your team can write, design, and create in your voice across AI tools. It minimizes editing. It doesn't eliminate it, and I won't tell you otherwise.

  • Interviews with founder, brand lead, and 1–2 voice owners
  • Audit of existing proposals, emails, social, scripts, and decks
  • Voice document: tone, vocabulary, no-go words, sentence structure, brand reflexes
  • Built into Claude as a Project, translates to Canva, ChatGPT, and other platforms
  • "If-this-then-that" guardrails: what the brand is and is not
  • Tuning period, plus a team walkthrough
Ongoing

Monthly Retainer

Month to month

Scoped with you and quoted before anything starts

Ongoing creative ops and AI support, sized to what your team is doing. Some months that means building a workflow and training people on it. Others it means being in Slack while your team works out what to hand off. We set the shape together and adjust it as the work changes.

  • Month to month, scaled up or down as things change
  • Slack on-call M–F
  • Strategy calls at a cadence we set together
  • Voice Kit extraction, delivered as a Claude Project
  • Workflow implementations and tooling recommendations across your existing stack
  • Team training and 1:1 prompting coaching when they're useful
The deep end

Embedded Partnership

Per engagement

Custom scope and timeline, quoted after a scoping call

Some engagements need more of me than a monthly retainer holds. A longer runway, several departments moving at once, or a team that wants me in the room while the decisions get made. Those get built around what you're trying to accomplish rather than a package I picked out in advance. Bring me that goal and I'll scope it, including saying so if something above already covers what you need.

  • More of my time, and more of it live with your team
  • Several departments or workstreams at once
  • A runway longer than month to month
  • Everything in the monthly retainer, scoped up
What gets built

The menu

Retainers and partnerships pull from the same list. Which pieces we use depends on where your team's time is going and what the audit turned up.

  • Brand voice extraction, built into Claude as a Project your team owns
  • Workflow implementations inside the Slack, Asana, and Notion you already use
  • Claude workspace architecture across departments, with a shared knowledge layer
  • Tool consolidation and financial operations cleanup
  • SOPs, onboarding boards, and documented process where nothing was written down
  • Team training workshops and 1:1 prompting coaching

How this works: every engagement gets scoped and quoted in full before anything starts, so you see the number before you commit to it. Payment is upfront or monthly in advance, no Net 30.

What I guarantee, and what I don't

Guaranteed

  • A delivered Voice Kit you own, as a working Claude Project
  • The workflow implementations named in your engagement, built and working
  • Training and documentation so your team runs it all without me
  • Straight answers about what AI can't do for you yet

Not guaranteed

  • Revenue gains, productivity multiples, or headcount changes
  • Specific time savings or cost savings
  • Team adoption rates
  • That your team is "fully self-sufficient" when the engagement ends. That's the trajectory, not the contract

When a real number does exist, I show you where it came from. Every metric in my case studies is labeled verified, client-estimated, or Danee-observed. That's the Receipts Framework, and it's how I'd rather earn trust than with a guarantee I can't back.

Proof

What this looks like in the wild

Raw Creative, a 12-person studio, went from operations living in five people's heads to Slack architecture, Asana as the source of truth, consolidated finances, and a Claude workspace across every department. The payroll fix, the tool consolidation, and a custom estimating engine are all documented in the case study, with every number labeled by source.

Read the Raw Creative case study

Start with the audit, or just talk it through

If you're weighing whether this fits your team, grab 30 minutes. If it's not a fit, I'll say so and point you somewhere useful.

Schedule a call